AR# 56976

描述

Version Found: v2.1
Version Resolved and other Known Issues: (Xilinx Answer 54645)

The FIRST_VF_OFFSET is calculated by subtracting the associated PF ID from VF ID.

FIRST_VF_OFFSET = VF ID - associated PF ID.

The FIRST_VF_OFFSET for PF0 is always at 64. VF ID for the first VF is 64 and PF0 ID is 0. Therefore, FIRST_VF_OFFSET for PF0 is = (VF ID - associated PF ID) = 64 - 0 = 64.

For PF1, the FIRST_VF_OFFSET is calculated in the same way.

FIRST_VF_OFFSET for PF1 is = (VF ID of the first VF attached to the PF1 - associated PF ID) = (VF ID of the first VF attached to PF1 - 1).

For example, if four VFs are attached to PF0 and two VFs are attached to PF1, the VF IDs will be:

VF0 - 64 ( attached to PF0 )
VF1 - 65 ( attached to PF0 )
VF2 - 66 ( attached to PF0 )
VF3 - 67 ( attached to PF0 )
VF4 - 68 ( attached to PF1 )
VF5 - 69 ( attached to PF1 )

FIRST_VF_OFFSET for PF1 is calculated as (68-1 = 67). However, when generating the Virtex-7 FPGA Gen3 Integrated Block for PCI Express v2.1 core, this value is incorrectly set to 68.

解决方案

This is a known issue that is scheduled to be fixed in a future release of the core.

To work around this issue, set the attribute PF1_SRIOV_VF_OFFSET to the correct value in the source file.

Note:

• This issue has been fixed in v2.2 of the core. However, the GUI still shows 68. The value is correctly set in the source file. The issue in the GUI will be fixed in a future release of the core.
• "Version Found" refers to the version where the problem was first discovered. The problem might also exist in earlier versions, but no specific testing has been performed to verify earlier versions.

Revision History
08/04/2013 - Initial release
12/18/2013 - Added note regarding the issue in v2.2

链接问答记录

主要问答记录